Showing posts with label Conservatism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conservatism. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

The Right and Anti-Hippieism

This is very, very true:
It’s hard to overestimate the role the old hippie-loathing, and the anti-ideal of youth rebellion in general, still play in the social thought of the modern intellectual Right. (In a recent review of The Wackness, for example, John Podhoretz described The Catcher in the Rye as a “pernicious book,” pernicious because it enshrined the pose of disaffection as the model for thoughtful youth.)
That's from Matt Feeney at The American Scene.

The loathing of certain aspects of youth culture is what creates, in my opinion, the vast majority of teenage conservatives* - particularly the nerdier ones. These kids are generally so frustrated by what they see as the sheer stupidity of the people around them - Don't they know smoking (cigarettes or weed) is bad for them? Don't they see that their anti-intellectualism (expressed by not doing basic homework assignments) will doom them?

Of course, other people simply have a boundless hatred of hippies, which causes them to become conservatives (generally with a libertarian streak). Their philosophy is best summed up by Matt Stone:
I hate conservatives, but I really fucking hate liberals.
At this point, I feel like it's important to note that the "South Park Republican/Conservative" label was retarded if only because the people who embrace it (along with Matt and Trey) just seem to hate anyone who is actually trying to make a positive change in the world.

*The one other thing that might create a lot is religion. But I think recent polling has shown a lot of religiously devout teenagers are liberal or apolitical.

Saturday, August 2, 2008

An Open Letter to David Kuo and Bill Bennett

I was working on a much longer piece about the possibility of a conservative version of Slate, which is one of my favorite websites. The post dealt with the ideology of Slate and The Atlantic and was sort of rambling. Then I realized I have only two things to say about the possibility of a conservative version of Slate:
Dear David Kuo and Bill Bennett,

Hire the staff of The American Scene to staff LibertyWire. Also change its name from LibertyWire to something more Slate-y or Salon-y. LibertyWire sounds like the name of a Pat Robertson-sponsored competitor to the Associated Press.

You're welcome,

K.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Discovering New Bloggers is Fun!

Although he'll probably make me smash my laptop against the wall at some point in the future, I've really been enjoying Daniel Larison's guest posts at The Daily Dish this week. He normally blogs at The American Conservative.

One nice post from him today:

At the TAC main blog, Clark Stooksbury points us to this gem from Limbaugh:

How does it make you feel that Zhang Linsen has a big Hummer with nine speakers blaring as he pulls out into a four-lane road with so much smog he basically can’t see the car in front of him, and you are trading in all of your cars and trying to go out and find basically a lawn mower?

Actually, it makes me feel relieved that I don't live in smog-infested cities where marathoners collapse and die because of the pollution.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

I think it's the money...

Contra Tim Noah, I'm pretty sure Jonah Goldberg and Dinesh D'Souza are smarter than their books indicate. However, they really are just replicating Ann Coulter's book-selling method. I think Ross Douthat/Reihan Salam, David Brooks, etc. show that contemporary conservatism isn't totally brain-dead. But at the same time, any non-brain dead work was getting immediately slapped with the "Traitor!" label and not selling. So, in order to make a living/supplement their income, they need to be needlessly incidenary.

So, in short, it's all about the money.



However, based on everything I've heard about the two books at hand (I've skimmed through The Enemy at Home, but I couldn't bring myself to read Liberal Fascism), I ultimately agree with Noah's assessment:

1. Yes, these books are more deeply researched than the typical Coulter screed and deserve to be taken seriously.
2. Taken seriously, these books reveal themselves to be nonsensical, overwrought, vile, and quite obviously wrong.